Previous Thread
Next Thread
New Reply
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
RSX or GTS #74841 Dec 29, 4:47pm Dec 29, 4:47pm
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
Riverside CA
2004 cardon blue Toyota Celica
Gunitceli OP
New Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Gunitceli OP
2004 cardon blue Toyota Celica
New Member
2004 Toyota Celica

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
Riverside CA
RSX or GTS


hey I'm currently out of the states and I was wondering if anybody had any guide as to me getting a new RSX or a GTS. I've been trying to decide for awhile now but just cant seem to pick between the two. I know it might seem dumb asking this quetion here but maybe somebody could help.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74842 Dec 29, 4:52pm Dec 29, 4:52pm
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,346
LA
S
spaztikid
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica
spaztikid
S
dikitzaps
1974 Toyota Celica

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,346
LA
get a GTS or an RSX-S

but i'd pick a celi over the rsx

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74843 Dec 29, 5:31pm Dec 29, 5:31pm
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,123
Milford, NJ
VSGTS14
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi
VSGTS14
05 WRB
2005 Subaru WRX STi

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,123
Milford, NJ
gts


SUBARU TECNICA INTERNATIONAL
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74844 Dec 29, 5:38pm Dec 29, 5:38pm
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 975
Smog City LA
2000 Liquid Silver Toyota Celica GT
xXMaGNuSXx
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT
xXMaGNuSXx
2000 Liquid Silver Toyota Celica GT
hookah-meister
2000 Toyota Celica GT

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 975
Smog City LA
Join the crowd and get a GTS. thumbsup

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74845 Dec 29, 5:42pm Dec 29, 5:42pm
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,619
Pennsylvania
L
LostAngel
Specialist
LostAngel
L
Specialist

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,619
Pennsylvania
I would pick the GTS over the RSX or RSX-S. I do like the rsx's, but they seem to look 'bulky' in my opinion. I think the Celica's look more sportier and have a nicer profile.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74846 Dec 29, 7:19pm Dec 29, 7:19pm
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 130
CALIFORNIA CITY, CA
Proffitt
Member
2002 Toyota Celica
Proffitt
Member
2002 Toyota Celica

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 130
CALIFORNIA CITY, CA
It would depend on what your plans are in the future. If you want a car you can buy mods for cheap then get the RSX-S. But if you want a car that looks great, handles better then get the GTS. I went through the same delimea but I ended up with the GTS for the looks and the Toyota quality. Hope my $.02 helps out.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74847 Dec 29, 7:27pm Dec 29, 7:27pm
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Carson, CA
D
DARKSTAR
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
DARKSTAR
D
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Carson, CA
RSX-S with a Cybernation Turbo kit!!! thumbsup


PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER OF DS*R
<font size="1">Sponsored By: Xenon Depot - DA Sports - Modified Toys - Access Motors - Karnage Motorsports</font>
[Linked Image]
Stage II++
NOS 50 Shot Nitrous
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DARKSTAR] #74848 Dec 29, 8:30pm Dec 29, 8:30pm
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 837
Cal LA
LinkTallica
Senior Member
1996 Geo Prizm
LinkTallica
Senior Member
1996 Geo Prizm

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 837
Cal LA
gts

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74849 Dec 29, 8:57pm Dec 29, 8:57pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 288
2003 Black Toyota Celica
1sweetGTS
Member
2003 Toyota Celica
1sweetGTS
2003 Black Toyota Celica
Member
2003 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 288
RSX's are tight as hell, but almost everyone here is gonna say Celica...but i'd go with a Celica just because they're awesome -- but i would like an RSX Type S too!!!


I dated this blind girl once... Her name was .::. ...:. ::.:
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: LinkTallica] #74850 Dec 29, 8:59pm Dec 29, 8:59pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
a stock gts is faster than a stock rsx-s. although the rsx-s has a bhp figure of 200, and the stock gts has a ghp of 180. when dyno'd the stock rsx-s puts out 163 horses (whp) and the celi puts out 161 horses (whp). so although the rsx-s puts out 2 more horses, this is lost in the weight difference and the drag coefficient (which the celica is better in).

modded..they are both able to put out equal numbers. so don't let power figures be your guide..they are both basically equal. in my opinion..you should just go with whichever one pleases your eye better. for me...it was my celi. thumbsup

edit--you can find the dyno's on power pages magazine..by import tuner. thumbsup

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74851 Dec 29, 9:32pm Dec 29, 9:32pm
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
CA
stefanoc
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
stefanoc
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
CA
i like celicas front while i like rsx tail lights more. the shifting on an rsx is easier.
take into consideration the model year. celica will change its model in less than a year, so if you buy it now, ull look a little old to others. im not saying anything bad, but ppl looking from outside maybe wont know that its brand new 04! i personally dont care about that, but maybe you do. rsx has 2 more years to go. consider that there are gonna be more rsx on the streets in the near future, even way more than celica. another thing is that you can find a lot of gt everywhere, but there arent a lot of gts, so ull be an exception getting a gts if you want to. overall, i would select a celica over an rsx. celica is the first and best sports car with the crazy looks.

as for performance, celica should have a better handling, faster launch(IMO) and slower end(IMO).

Here are some important performance specs i did:
GTS RSX-S
180 hp 200hp
2500 lbs 2767 lbs

After calculations this is what you get
I calculated so i can find how many pounds each HP carries on each of the car.
GTS: 13.90 lbs/hp (13.8888 to be exact)
RSX-S: 13.85 lbs/hp (13.835 to be exact)
The difference is 0.05 pounds per hp.
To equal GTS lbs/hp to RSX-S, you need 9.70lbs reduction on ur GTS, which will total out to 2490.30lbs
If you want to equal them out with hp, then you should have your GTS hp to 184.5!
This calculation is only related to hp and weights, other stuffs might make differences like torque and all that. Hopefully the stats help you out (someone has done this b4 in a post, but with a lil different weights)

If sPeEd4tHeNeEd's whp comment true, than DAMMMN!

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74852 Dec 29, 9:34pm Dec 29, 9:34pm
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,587
Chicago, IL
xmangt1
4 All U Haterz!
2000 Toyota Celica GT
xmangt1
4 All U Haterz!
2000 Toyota Celica GT

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,587
Chicago, IL
GTS(good info stefanoc)

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: stefanoc] #74853 Dec 29, 9:57pm Dec 29, 9:57pm
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,077
Saint Louis, MO
slidr
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica
slidr
Specialist
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,077
Saint Louis, MO
Originally Posted by stefanoc

i like celicas front while i like rsx tail lights more. the shifting on an rsx is easier.
take into consideration the model year. celica will change its model in less than a year, so if you buy it now, ull look a little old to others. im not saying anything bad, but ppl looking from outside maybe wont know that its brand new 04! i personally dont care about that, but maybe you do. rsx has 2 more years to go. consider that there are gonna be more rsx on the streets in the near future, even way more than celica. another thing is that you can find a lot of gt everywhere, but there arent a lot of gts, so ull be an exception getting a gts if you want to. overall, i would select a celica over an rsx. celica is the first and best sports car with the crazy looks.

as for performance, celica should have a better handling, faster launch(IMO) and slower end(IMO).

Here are some important performance specs i did:
GTS RSX-S
180 hp 200hp
2500 lbs 2767 lbs

After calculations this is what you get
I calculated so i can find how many pounds each HP carries on each of the car.
GTS: 13.90 lbs/hp (13.8888 to be exact)
RSX-S: 13.85 lbs/hp (13.835 to be exact)
The difference is 0.05 pounds per hp.
To equal GTS lbs/hp to RSX-S, you need 9.70lbs reduction on ur GTS, which will total out to 2490.30lbs
If you want to equal them out with hp, then you should have your GTS hp to 184.5!
This calculation is only related to hp and weights, other stuffs might make differences like torque and all that. Hopefully the stats help you out (someone has done this b4 in a post, but with a lil different weights)

If sPeEd4tHeNeEd's whp comment true, than DAMMMN!
Most people do hp/lbs, but whatever. According to your calculations, yes, you would need those specific changes to equal the cars out. But you have to realize that those horsepower numbers are taken at the flywheel and not the wheels, so sPeEd4tHeNeEd calculations are a little more accurate except that GTS's dyno for the most part in the low 150's not low 160's.

But you could boggle your mind over this math all day, but it's still a drivers race stock wise. All engines put out different numbers, many drivers differ in weight obviously, and so many other factors come into play such as aerodynamics, gear ratios, torque, etc.

With RSX's you get more horsepower per dollar and they can be modded to be faster than a GTS, but only after thousands of dollars which I'm sure a lot of people aren't willing to spend. I'm gonna tell you to get a GTS because I have one and a lot of other people on this site are going to do the same because the name of the site is EverythingCelica.

The deciding factor in buying a car should absoultely not be based on speed alone. If you want more speed for your money, go buy a Mustang or something. You should do a lot more research by yourself on reliability, warranties, bang for your buck, the list goes on. Your mind should be open when buying a car, and no one here will bring forth enough decent evidence for you to make up your mind unless your parents are buying this car for you and you have to pay absolutely nothing yourself. Go to Edmunds.com or some other consumer review site, and see what people have to say about the mechanically or whatever. Doing what someone tells you to do on a Celica website would make no sense because no one really cares about your situation to tell you which car would be best for you. Only you can decide this, and my advice to you would be to gather info on both of the cars, test drive them, and then make an educated decision, because I'm sure that you havn't done all of those yet. Then come back here and ask us specific questions about different issues with the Celicas or go to an RSX site and do the same.

I'm not flaming you or anything, I just don't think it's fair to you to have us make up your mind for you. Buy a car you love inside and out, and don't listen or care about what anyone else thinks. thumbsup


Aqua Teen Hunger Force...number one in the hood, G
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: xmangt1] #74854 Dec 29, 9:57pm Dec 29, 9:57pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
stefanoc..here is the link: power pages: rsx-s

in this testing..the base rsx-s only put out 159.9 horses. the one i posted above was from a different issue and it was 163 horses. this is a fairly normal difference as all cars will have some degree of variance and different dynonameters will have readouts that are slightly different.

in any case, a celica gts' average base whp is 161.

a gts weighs 2,500 pounds while an rsx-s weighs 2,800 pounds...so using power-to-weight ratios for the celica gts whp (160..rounded down from 161)and the rsx-s whp (160..rounded up from 159.9) you would get something like this:

gts: 4/62.5
rsx-s:4/70

it is clear that the celica is more power efficient. thumbsup




Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74855 Dec 29, 10:07pm Dec 29, 10:07pm
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Carson, CA
D
DARKSTAR
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
DARKSTAR
D
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Carson, CA
Cybernation Turbokit is putting out anywhere from 240-450whp. the K20 is one of the greatest engines I have seen!


PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER OF DS*R
<font size="1">Sponsored By: Xenon Depot - DA Sports - Modified Toys - Access Motors - Karnage Motorsports</font>
[Linked Image]
Stage II++
NOS 50 Shot Nitrous
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: slidr] #74856 Dec 29, 10:15pm Dec 29, 10:15pm
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
CA
stefanoc
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica
stefanoc
Specialist
2002 Toyota Celica

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,864
CA
Originally Posted by slidr
Originally Posted by stefanoc
i like celicas front while i like rsx tail lights more. the shifting on an rsx is easier.
take into consideration the model year. celica will change its model in less than a year, so if you buy it now, ull look a little old to others. im not saying anything bad, but ppl looking from outside maybe wont know that its brand new 04! i personally dont care about that, but maybe you do. rsx has 2 more years to go. consider that there are gonna be more rsx on the streets in the near future, even way more than celica. another thing is that you can find a lot of gt everywhere, but there arent a lot of gts, so ull be an exception getting a gts if you want to. overall, i would select a celica over an rsx. celica is the first and best sports car with the crazy looks.

as for performance, celica should have a better handling, faster launch(IMO) and slower end(IMO).

Here are some important performance specs i did:
GTS RSX-S
180 hp 200hp
2500 lbs 2767 lbs

After calculations this is what you get
I calculated so i can find how many pounds each HP carries on each of the car.
GTS: 13.90 lbs/hp (13.8888 to be exact)
RSX-S: 13.85 lbs/hp (13.835 to be exact)
The difference is 0.05 pounds per hp.
To equal GTS lbs/hp to RSX-S, you need 9.70lbs reduction on ur GTS, which will total out to 2490.30lbs
If you want to equal them out with hp, then you should have your GTS hp to 184.5!
This calculation is only related to hp and weights, other stuffs might make differences like torque and all that. Hopefully the stats help you out (someone has done this b4 in a post, but with a lil different weights)

If sPeEd4tHeNeEd's whp comment true, than DAMMMN!
Most people do hp/lbs, but whatever. According to your calculations, yes, you would need those specific changes to equal the cars out. But you have to realize that those horsepower numbers are taken at the flywheel and not the wheels, so sPeEd4tHeNeEd calculations are a little more accurate except that GTS's dyno for the most part in the low 150's not low 160's.

But you could boggle your mind over this math all day, but it's still a drivers race stock wise. All engines put out different numbers, many drivers differ in weight obviously, and so many other factors come into play such as aerodynamics, gear ratios, torque, etc.

With RSX's you get more horsepower per dollar and they can be modded to be faster than a GTS, but only after thousands of dollars which I'm sure a lot of people aren't willing to spend. I'm gonna tell you to get a GTS because I have one and a lot of other people on this site are going to do the same because the name of the site is EverythingCelica.

The deciding factor in buying a car should absoultely not be based on speed alone. If you want more speed for your money, go buy a Mustang or something. You should do a lot more research by yourself on reliability, warranties, bang for your buck, the list goes on. Your mind should be open when buying a car, and no one here will bring forth enough decent evidence for you to make up your mind unless your parents are buying this car for you and you have to pay absolutely nothing yourself. Go to Edmunds.com or some other consumer review site, and see what people have to say about the mechanically or whatever. Doing what someone tells you to do on a Celica website would make no sense because no one really cares about your situation to tell you which car would be best for you. Only you can decide this, and my advice to you would be to gather info on both of the cars, test drive them, and then make an educated decision, because I'm sure that you havn't done all of those yet. Then come back here and ask us specific questions about different issues with the Celicas or go to an RSX site and do the same.

I'm not flaming you or anything, I just don't think it's fair to you to have us make up your mind for you. Buy a car you love inside and out, and don't listen or care about what anyone else thinks. thumbsup


ur right. i also like the looks of a celica as i mentioned, and that was just stuff i thought about. i am not forcing the guy to buy it or anything. my 2 cents only and plus some numbers. ur right about a dollar per hp thing also. i wonder if 2500lbs of gts is weighed with full tank of gas in it or is it just weighed empty... anyone has a clue (sorry to go a little off topic)

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DARKSTAR] #74857 Dec 29, 10:17pm Dec 29, 10:17pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Originally Posted by DARKSTAR
Cybernation Turbokit is putting out anywhere from 240-450whp. the K20 is one of the greatest engines I have seen!


true that. with $$ almost anything is possible. but personally i would worry about the added strain on your engine of adding at least 80 extra horses. do you have any psi figures for that turbo? if they are actually low..then thats awesome. thumbsup thumbsup

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74858 Dec 29, 10:18pm Dec 29, 10:18pm
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Carson, CA
D
DARKSTAR
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
DARKSTAR
D
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Carson, CA
Cybernation turbo @ 6psi is around 275whp.

The K20 is a very powerful engine. NA K20's are putting around 300whp.

Thing that makes the RSX better than the GTS... the aftermarket support.


PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER OF DS*R
<font size="1">Sponsored By: Xenon Depot - DA Sports - Modified Toys - Access Motors - Karnage Motorsports</font>
[Linked Image]
Stage II++
NOS 50 Shot Nitrous
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: stefanoc] #74859 Dec 29, 10:18pm Dec 29, 10:18pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
slidr--horses(in whp)/weight is listed in my post above. thumbsup

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DARKSTAR] #74860 Dec 29, 10:20pm Dec 29, 10:20pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA

Originally Posted by DARKSTAR
Cybernation turbo @ 6psi is around 275whp.

The K20 is a very powerful engine. NA K20's are putting around 300whp.

Thing that makes the RSX better than the GTS... the aftermarket support.


6psi really isnt that bad..thats some good numbers thumbsup

and ditto on your 2nd point...honda/acura has always been the standard when testing aftermarket support. and it doesnt seem to be slowing down one bit.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Speed4TheNeed] #74861 Dec 29, 10:24pm Dec 29, 10:24pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
^^^^^ question about fuel tanks and whether this comes into play with curb weights.

curb weights of cars are usually measured with the gas tank being empty. in any case, the celicas gas tank capacity of 14.5 gallons and the rsx-s gas tank capacity of 13.2 gallons is virtually equal.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74862 Dec 29, 10:25pm Dec 29, 10:25pm
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Carson, CA
D
DARKSTAR
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX
DARKSTAR
D
Member
2003 Subaru Impreza WRX

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 74
Carson, CA
very good point!!!


PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER OF DS*R
<font size="1">Sponsored By: Xenon Depot - DA Sports - Modified Toys - Access Motors - Karnage Motorsports</font>
[Linked Image]
Stage II++
NOS 50 Shot Nitrous
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74863 Dec 29, 10:42pm Dec 29, 10:42pm
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 493
Springfield,MA
Blue_Jaggon
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica
Blue_Jaggon
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 493
Springfield,MA
either choice u'll be staified...same car speed wise pretty much rsx type s little more power but i'd prefer celica over rsx with looks thumbsup

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74864 Dec 29, 11:08pm Dec 29, 11:08pm

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
A
Unregistered



go with the GTS if you want looks
go with the RSX-S if you want more aftermarket support.

if your into racing go with the RSX, it has a bit more potential.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74865 Dec 29, 11:15pm Dec 29, 11:15pm
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 753
Southeastern, Illinois
blackcel
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
blackcel
Senior Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 753
Southeastern, Illinois
GTS, Celicas are GREAT!!!


[Linked Image]
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74866 Dec 30, 12:26am Dec 30, 12:26am
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Donegan
Member
Donegan
Member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
If you want to go JDM and follow the Japanese tuners, go with the DC5. It's a great car and one of the best car in its class for 6 years. (I got that info from BMI) You'll go pretty far with it.

If you want to go semi-JDM and follow some minor Japanese tuners, go with the GTS. It's a great car and one of the best looking cars in its class. You'll get some heads turning.

They're both fun cars, but my vote goes to the DC5...RSX Type-S.

But I wouldn't bother getting any of the bases. (RSX/GT)

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74867 Dec 30, 12:39am Dec 30, 12:39am

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
A
Unregistered



^^exactly

Re: RSX or GTS #74868 Dec 30, 9:18am Dec 30, 9:18am
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
imo, jdm is on the down. less and less people are going jdm in part because the domestic tuner market is starting to pick up pace (although still not on par with jdm) also, many people, including me, think jdm to be to ricy in some cases.

you're right about potential though...rsx-s does have more potential do to honda/acura's clout in the aftermarket world. thumbsup

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DARKSTAR] #74869 Dec 30, 9:24am Dec 30, 9:24am
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by DARKSTAR
Cybernation turbo @ 6psi is around 275whp.

The K20 is a very powerful engine. NA K20's are putting around 300whp.

Thing that makes the RSX better than the GTS... the aftermarket support.


Yes, but not everyone wants to spend $10-20K on their car.

I'd say that 80-90% of RSX and Celica owners spend less than $4-5K on their car with performance mods.

In that range, the GTS is a better car overall. The RSX looks and handles like a tank.

And what is with the interior? The shifter area looks like an economy car puke rice


To have played and laughed with enthusiasm
and sung with exultation
To know even one life has breathed easier
This is to have succeeded.
Re: RSX or GTS #74870 Dec 30, 9:25am Dec 30, 9:25am
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by Shinobi
if your into racing go with the RSX, it has a bit more potential.


rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

RSX + Auto-x track = hilarious blooper reel


To have played and laughed with enthusiasm
and sung with exultation
To know even one life has breathed easier
This is to have succeeded.
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DiabloGTS] #74871 Dec 30, 9:33am Dec 30, 9:33am
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Originally Posted by DiabloGTS
Originally Posted by DARKSTAR
Cybernation turbo @ 6psi is around 275whp.

The K20 is a very powerful engine. NA K20's are putting around 300whp.

Thing that makes the RSX better than the GTS... the aftermarket support.


Yes, but not everyone wants to spend $10-20K on their car.

I'd say that 80-90% of RSX and Celica owners spend less than $4-5K on their car with performance mods.

In that range, the GTS is a better car overall. The RSX looks and handles like a tank.

And what is with the interior? The shifter area looks like an economy car puke rice


true that. celica is "race-inspired" haha the looks are anyway.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74872 Dec 30, 9:48am Dec 30, 9:48am
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,672
towson, md
2003 blue Toyota Celica
ragingpaseo
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica
ragingpaseo
2003 blue Toyota Celica
Specialist
2003 Toyota Celica

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,672
towson, md
RSX-S have a full aftermarket support, a tick faster than GTS, so-so handling.

GTS have lesser aftermarket support, wonderful looks, execellent handling.

i know i'm not saying a lot here, but believe me. i've been looking at the celica since jan 2000, i've also compare with RSX-S before i bought it 2 weeks ago, celica is so much better overall. you should go test drive it if you haven't done so...

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: ragingpaseo] #74873 Dec 30, 9:51am Dec 30, 9:51am
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Originally Posted by ragingpaseo
RSX-S have a full aftermarket support, a tick faster than GTS, so-so handling.

GTS have lesser aftermarket support, wonderful looks, execellent handling.

i know i'm not saying a lot here, but believe me. i've been looking at the celica since jan 2000, i've also compare with RSX-S before i bought it 2 weeks ago, celica is so much better overall. you should go test drive it if you haven't done so...


rsx-s stock is slower than gts stock. not vice-versa.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Speed4TheNeed] #74874 Dec 30, 9:55am Dec 30, 9:55am
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Originally Posted by sPeEd4tHeNeEd
Originally Posted by ragingpaseo
RSX-S have a full aftermarket support, a tick faster than GTS, so-so handling.

GTS have lesser aftermarket support, wonderful looks, execellent handling.

i know i'm not saying a lot here, but believe me. i've been looking at the celica since jan 2000, i've also compare with RSX-S before i bought it 2 weeks ago, celica is so much better overall. you should go test drive it if you haven't done so...


rsx-s stock is slower than gts stock. not vice-versa.


well if you want, scratch that...thats my opinion because i have beaten a few. but if you want official numbers, the 1/4 for gts is 15.2 compared with 14.8 for rsx-s. so officially an rsx-s is a bit faster than the gts.

but i have seen dynos of the rsx-s producing less than 3 horses over the gts (link is posted above) and i doubt that 3 horses makes up for an extra 300 pounds of weight plus a higher drag coefficient.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74875 Dec 30, 12:15pm Dec 30, 12:15pm
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Donegan
Member
Donegan
Member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
The DC5 bred from pure racing. Without racing, the Type-R's wouldn't exist.

Honda made a racing car that people could afford and so they came out with the Type-R's.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74876 Dec 30, 5:18pm Dec 30, 5:18pm
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
Riverside CA
2004 cardon blue Toyota Celica
Gunitceli OP
New Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Gunitceli OP
2004 cardon blue Toyota Celica
New Member
2004 Toyota Celica

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
Riverside CA

hey thanks to errbody for the info and what not, I actually have a nice wad of cash to putinto the car and I was asking because my friend has a celica and is always saying if I get a RSX he'll beat me and I just wanted to know if the GTS was worht all the hop-la

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74877 Dec 30, 5:30pm Dec 30, 5:30pm
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
Riverside CA
2004 cardon blue Toyota Celica
Gunitceli OP
New Member
2004 Toyota Celica
Gunitceli OP
2004 cardon blue Toyota Celica
New Member
2004 Toyota Celica

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
Riverside CA


okay now i want to ask, all I really plan to do is probably I/e/h, nothing to major, maybe some other small things, and I'm inti racing sometimes, mainly just to kill all the chumps who's daddy bought thema crappy civic. so with just those mods is it still pretty much just a drivers race or what.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74878 Dec 30, 6:12pm Dec 30, 6:12pm
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Donegan
Member
Donegan
Member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Your friend sounds like he's blinded by the truth.

It's dangerous, but take him on the highway. He won't catch up once you get in front.

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74879 Dec 30, 6:24pm Dec 30, 6:24pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,926
Arizona
celicaTRDgts
Specialist
02 Toyota Celica
celicaTRDgts
Specialist
02 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,926
Arizona
i like the celica...the interior is way nicer...seems all in reach...where rsx is all over...hard to explain...i have a gts and my twin has an rsx...i take the gts over the rsx grin


[Linked Image]
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: celicaTRDgts] #74880 Dec 30, 7:08pm Dec 30, 7:08pm
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 634
CA, Nor*cal
R
RacerX225
Senior Member
1989 GMC 1500 pickup
RacerX225
R
Senior Member
1989 GMC 1500 pickup

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 634
CA, Nor*cal
I saw a Black RSX-S a couple days ago. It was lowered with stock wheels. Looked pretty clean IMO. But I like the Celica better grin


BTW on a side not he revved on me and wanted to race grin but I know that street really well and theres always cops driven around. thumbsdown


"Champions train, losers complain."




Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74881 Dec 30, 7:12pm Dec 30, 7:12pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Originally Posted by Gunitceli


okay now i want to ask, all I really plan to do is probably I/e/h, nothing to major, maybe some other small things, and I'm inti racing sometimes, mainly just to kill all the chumps who's daddy bought thema crappy civic. so with just those mods is it still pretty much just a drivers race or what.


headers give an average of 3-4 horses
exhausts give an average of 4-8 horses
and the trial header will give you about 10 horses (this is the only dyno i have seen of a header for the celica gts..but the only other header i would do is the one that dc motorsports is developing that is scheduled to come out sometime this january. obviously i havnt seen any stats on this, but judging from the history of the company--i'm sure its top notch. not to mention it will be cheaper than trial because you won't have to ship it from japan)

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Donegan] #74882 Dec 30, 7:37pm Dec 30, 7:37pm
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by Donegan
Your friend sounds like he's blinded by the truth.

It's dangerous, but take him on the highway. He won't catch up once you get in front.


If you mean the RSX will beat a GTS on th highway, you are wrong.

Coefficient of drag is a bitch at 130 grin


To have played and laughed with enthusiasm
and sung with exultation
To know even one life has breathed easier
This is to have succeeded.
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DiabloGTS] #74883 Dec 30, 7:41pm Dec 30, 7:41pm
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica
Speed4TheNeed
Caleb
2000 Toyota Celica

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,372
New Orleans, LA
rule of thumb: the faster you are going the more it is a car's race and the less it is a driver's race.

drivint skill comes into play mainly during acceleration. as your gears become bigger and bigger, the slower you are accelerating...especially when you start running out of power.

that said, i'm pretty sure the celica has a lower drag coefficient than that of an rsx.


Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Gunitceli] #74884 Dec 30, 11:07pm Dec 30, 11:07pm
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 47
2000 absolute red Toyota Celica GT
eastsideyodi
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT
eastsideyodi
2000 absolute red Toyota Celica GT
Member
2000 Toyota Celica GT

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 47
never liked the way rsx's looks, but with a little mods i guess it'll be ok. but i'll definitely go with a celica, all the way. smile

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Speed4TheNeed] #74885 Dec 30, 11:24pm Dec 30, 11:24pm
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by sPeEd4tHeNeEd
rule of thumb: the faster you are going the more it is a car's race and the less it is a driver's race.

drivint skill comes into play mainly during acceleration. as your gears become bigger and bigger, the slower you are accelerating...especially when you start running out of power.

that said, i'm pretty sure the celica has a lower drag coefficient than that of an rsx.



rule of thumb: a high speed race is ALWAYS a drivers race.

130 MPH isn't just "cruisin'" unless you want to end up dead wink

RSX is crap at that speed, btw. Worst than a Mustang puke


To have played and laughed with enthusiasm
and sung with exultation
To know even one life has breathed easier
This is to have succeeded.
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DiabloGTS] #74886 Dec 30, 11:58pm Dec 30, 11:58pm
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Donegan
Member
Donegan
Member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Originally Posted by DiabloGTS

If you mean the RSX will beat a GTS on th highway, you are wrong.

Coefficient of drag is a bitch at 130 grin


No, I'm talking about the Type-S.

Why would you compare a base with a upgrade?

That's like saying:

Which has a better top-end...Lancer or GT-R? (Don't answer this)

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Donegan] #74887 Dec 31, 12:00am Dec 31, 12:00am
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by Donegan
Originally Posted by DiabloGTS
If you mean the RSX will beat a GTS on th highway, you are wrong.

Coefficient of drag is a bitch at 130 grin


No, I'm talking about the Type-S.

Why would you compare a base with a upgrade?

That's like saying:

Which has a better top-end...Lancer or GT-R? (Don't answer this)


So am I.

The RSX-S only puts down 3 more WHP than the GTS, and it weighs more and has a higher coefficient of drag.

Stock for stock, the celica kills it. Mod for mod, the celica kills it (save for hondata)

On the track...well, we won't go there.


To have played and laughed with enthusiasm
and sung with exultation
To know even one life has breathed easier
This is to have succeeded.
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DiabloGTS] #74888 Dec 31, 12:01am Dec 31, 12:01am
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Donegan
Member
Donegan
Member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Originally Posted by DiabloGTS
So am I.

The RSX-S only puts down 3 more WHP than the GTS, and it weighs more and has a higher coefficient of drag.

Stock for stock, the celica kills it. Mod for mod, the celica kills it (save for hondata)

On the track...well, we won't go there.


No...

crazy

Re: RSX or GTS [Re: Donegan] #74889 Dec 31, 12:03am Dec 31, 12:03am
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250
DiabloGTS
Wheezy Joe
2002 Kawasaki Ninja 250

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,451
Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by Donegan
Originally Posted by DiabloGTS
So am I.

The RSX-S only puts down 3 more WHP than the GTS, and it weighs more and has a higher coefficient of drag.

Stock for stock, the celica kills it. Mod for mod, the celica kills it (save for hondata)

On the track...well, we won't go there.


No...

crazy


thatsfunny You


To have played and laughed with enthusiasm
and sung with exultation
To know even one life has breathed easier
This is to have succeeded.
Re: RSX or GTS [Re: DiabloGTS] #74890 Dec 31, 12:05am Dec 31, 12:05am
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Donegan
Member
Donegan
Member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
JAPAN
Originally Posted by DiabloGTS
thatsfunny You


Ahahaha.

If it makes you feel better.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Join the conversation - Register Now or Log In to add your comment


Moderated by  isaac 

Member Spotlight
ev3
ev3
2002 Toyota Celica ZR
Australia

Posts: 498
Joined: July 2003
Thanks: all the ecelica crew!
Random: zoom zoom
Show All Member Profiles 
Recent Topics
Resurrecting a 2000 GT automatic.
by cosmo64. 10/19/2017 1:19 PM
APR strut bar brace for 2000 GTS
by TweakMaster. 10/15/2017 8:02 PM
Help with vacuum hose
by Chaos. 10/15/2017 6:07 PM
My 2000 GTS
by TweakMaster. 10/14/2017 6:29 PM
Replaced bad MAF. Now getting p0300/p1300 CEL codes. HELP!
by Bblee1989. 10/14/2017 4:34 PM
What kind of rim is this?
by mariahjordan. 10/10/2017 8:05 PM
Changed Headlight but so Dimm
by smsih. 10/10/2017 2:55 PM
Anyone know this remote unlock key? trying to ID it!
by kieronboz. 10/04/2017 2:36 AM
Customize Your Toyota Celica Privacy Policy · About · Contact
Privacy Policy · About · Contact
CelicaHobby.com is an independent Toyota Celica enthusiast website. CelicaHobby.com is not sponsored by or affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. in any way. The Toyota and Celica names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.
© CelicaHobby.com, 2001-2017
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Snapshot build 20171020)