Ok. I can see that this is slowly headed toward a pissing contest.
There are VARIOUS OPINIONS as to the capabilities of the Spyder. Enough said.
I agree with CT in that track times are innacurate measurements, especially when it is ONE set of track times. Furthermore, in the comparison listed, the Celica was running a 2zz. You should put a SPyder in there running a 2zz and then look at the track times.
But, most importantly, I have failed to remember that this is a Celica board and this forum specifically is designed for the discussion of the Celica. I extend an apology to all Celica members for having gotten off track.
I made this post only to say I had traded my Celica for a Spyder, but would like to remain an active member on the forum since I did invest so much money and time into my Celica and had made so many friends here in the process.
I'm now very active at Spyderchat.com and will be spending most of my time there. But, I plan on hanging around here as well like so many other people who ended up trading there Celica's but still remain active members here...to the best of my knowledge.
My MR-S is a completely different car than my Celica. Both serve 2 different purposes and each does it very well. Every car has it's goods and bads. I don't want to fall into a pissing contest over 2 toyota's. There are enough lame ass Honda drivers out there to do that. (not to piss off any honda drivers, as there are some great honda's. Just to many people who want to add a muffler and a roll call and expect there car to be fast).
Ok. I think I've said it all. Thanks to all of you who posted with kind comments on my car. It's made me feel warm and fuzzy.
FASTCELICA, thank you for your opnions.
Everyone has their own and that's what makes the world go around.
Ok...have to go drive the Spyder now...and maybe show a few Celica owners out there which car REALLY handles best...
Then, after the 2zz...which one is actually fastest...