| Country | Banned | Notes |
|---|
| Australia | Yes | Banned in all states -fines vary though. |
| Austria | Yes | Fines vary - up toUS$22 per incident |
| Bahrain | Yes | Offenders face fines - possibly prison |
| Belgium | Yes | Phones can be usedwithout a hands-free unit when the car is stationary -but not while in traffic (such as at traffic lights) |
| Brazil | Yes | Ban imposed Jan. 2001 |
| Botswana | Beingdebated | The attorney generalis drafting the legislation |
| Canada | Variable | Banned in Newfoundland(Dec2002) fines up to C$180 - Banned in Qu�bec (Apr2008) fines up to C$100. |
| Chile | Yes | |
| China | Yes | Reported to be covered by general "good driving practice" legislation. |
| CzechRepublic | Yes | |
| Denmark | Yes | Ban imposed July 1998- US$60 fine for infringements |
| Egypt | Yes | Fines of about US$100per offence. |
| Finland | Yes | Ban imposed January2003 - US$55 fine for infringements |
| France | Yes | Banned 2003, EUR40 fine per infraction |
| Germany | Yes | Ban imposed Feb. 2001- usage allowed without a hands-free unit only when theengine is switched off. Fine of �40 per infraction |
| Greece | Yes | |
| Hong Kong | Yes | |
| Hungary | Yes | Not often implementedby the police |
| India -New Delhi | Yes | New Delhi - Banextended to ban all use of cell phones when driving,including use with a hands-free unit - July 2001 Andhra Pradesh - Ban now enforced with prisonsentences |
| Ireland | Yes | Banned, with a US$380and/or up to 3 months imprisonment on a third offence.Handsfree kits allowed, although that is subject toreview. |
| Isle ofMan | Yes | Banned since July 2000 |
| Israel | Yes | |
| Italy | Yes | Fines of up to US$124per infraction |
| Japan | Yes | Ban imposed Nov. 1999 |
| Jersey | Yes | Ban imposed Feb. 1998 |
| Jordan | Yes | Ban imposed Oct. 2001 |
| Kenya | Yes | Ban imposed late 2001 |
| Malaysia | Yes | |
| Mexico | Partial | Ban in Mexico City |
| Netherlands | Yes | Fines up to €2,000 or two weeks in jail |
| NewZealand | Beingdebated | Under debate -consultation being sought from interested parties |
| Norway | Yes | Fines of over $600 perinfraction |
| Pakistan | Partial | Banned in Islamabad |
| Philippines | Yes | |
| Poland | Yes | Fine of PLN200 ($100) - can be higher if contested. |
| Portugal | Yes | |
| Romania | Yes | |
| Russia | Yes | Ban imposed by PrimeMinister - March 2001 |
| Singapore | Yes | |
| SlovakRepublic | Yes | |
| Slovenia | Yes | |
| SouthAfrica | Yes | |
| SouthKorea | Yes | Ban imposed July 2001- US$47 fine + 15 points on the license. |
| Spain | Yes | |
| Sweden | No | |
| Switzerland | Yes | |
| Taiwan | Yes | If the driver is usinga reflective screen on the car, local privacy lawsforbid stopping the car for violating the ban. |
| Thailand | Yes | Bill proposed in May2000 |
| Turkey | Yes | |
| Turkmenistan | Yes | Signed into law witheffect from May 1st 2003, by President SaparmyratTurkmenbasy |
| UK | Yes | Banned from December2003 |
| Zimbabwe | Yes | Ban imposed in Sept2001, announced via official news agency only though, sonot confirmed |
| State | Banned? | Notes |
|---|
| Alabama | No | |
| Alaska | No | |
| Arkansas | Partial | School busdrivers are banned from using a cell phone. |
| Arizona | Partial | A bill tointroduce a ban was lost by a 4-3 vote in the SenateTransportation Committee. Bus drivers are banned fromusing a cell phone |
| California | Yes | Beginning July 1, 2008,violators face a US$20 fine for a first offense and aUS$50 ticket for subsequent infractions. Law passed Sept2007 bans all under-18s from using a phone at all, evenwith handsfree kit. |
| Colorado | No | Teens with restricted licenses are banned - but can only bestopped for another violation first |
| Connecticut | Yes | Banned with effect from Oct. 2005 - teens are also forbidden from using handsfree kits while moving |
| Delaware | No | A drivercan already be prosecuted for "inattentivedriving" - which can include using a cell phone.Studies into the issue have been requested |
| Districtof Columbia | Yes | Bannedfrom July 2004 |
| Florida | Partial | StateAttorney General said that cities can set localregulations - July 2001. Overturned by Governor Bush.. |
| Georgia | Partial | School bus drivers banned from usingcell phones while driving. DeKalbCounty has fines when crashes can be attributed todriving while using a cellphone. |
| Hawaii | Beingdebated | A bill hasbeen introduced in Hawaii'slegislature by Sen. Joseph Souki, D-Wailuku-Waiehu. |
| Idaho | No | |
| Illinois | Partial | School busdrivers are banned - Chicago and Gary City Council havepassed local laws banning driving without a hands-freekit. |
| Indiana | No | Banproposed by State Sen. Rose Antich Carr - Jan 2004 |
| Iowa | Beingdebated | |
| Kansas | No | Bill tointroduce ban failed in 2000 |
| Kentucky | No | |
| Louisiana | Partial | Teenagers and new drivers are banned - all driversbanned from text messaging only. |
| Maine | Partial | Minors andthose on learner driving licenses may not use a cellphone while driving |
| Maryland | No | Bill toban dropped Feb. 2001. New proposal in the House,proposed by Delegates Arnick and Mandel |
| Massachusetts | Partial | Bill formost users pending - but bus drivers already banned.Drivers required to keep at least one hand on thesteering wheel while holding a phone. |
| Michigan | No | |
| Minnesota | Partial | Teenagers and provisional drivers are banned - $100 fine plus delays in license upgrades for offenders |
| Mississippi | No | Legislationprevents local councils enacting their own ban. |
| Missouri | No | |
| Montana | No | |
| Nebraska | No | Billplanned by State Sen. Jim Cudaback - Jan 2004 |
| Nevada | No | State billto introduce ban failed April 1999. Local bill in ClarkCounty also blocked Nov. 2001. Nevada state passed billbanning local regulations, March 2003. |
| NewHampshire | Partial | Notexplicitly banned, but you can be prosecuted if using acellphone when involved in an driving accident. |
| New Jersey | Yes | Banned from 2004, updated from March 2008 - fine US$100.Bill extended June 2008 to include text messaging. |
| NewMexico | Partial | Beingdebated - local ban in the cities of Santa Fe, Albuquerque, Taos, and Las Vegas |
| NewYork | Yes | Baneffective from Nov. 2001 |
| NorthCarolina | Beingdebated | Study intothe effects of cell phone usage while driving beingcarried out. |
| NorthDakota | Beingdebated | Billproposed by Sen. Harvey Tallackson, D-Grafton, Feb 2005 |
| Ohio | Partial | The Cityof Cleveland is discussing a ban. Ban in place inBrooklyn. |
| Oklahoma | No | Bill tointroduce ban failed in May 1999. Legislation preventslocal councils enacting their own ban. |
| Oregon | Partial | Ban applies to teenagers only. |
| Pennsylvania | Partial | Localcities have their own laws - state legislation pending |
| RhodeIsland | No | GovernorAlmond rejected a ban - July 2001. School buses arebanned from using a cell phone. Proposal for a ban beingdebated, April 2004. |
| South Carolina | Partial | Bill to ban holders of a beginner's permit, conditional or special restricted driver's license passed by House committee, April 2008 |
| SouthDakota | No | |
| Tennessee | Partial | Schoolbuses are banned from using a cell phone |
| Texas | No | Senate Bill 154 proposed. If passed would come into effect from 2008. A previous attempt in 2005 failed |
| Utah | No | Bill tointroduce ban failed March 1998. Highland city planninga ban - Feb 2005 |
| Vermont | No | |
| Virginia | Partial | Bill banning minors passed Jan 2005. Bill banning 16-17yr olds with conditional licenses passed March 2007 |
| Washington | Yes | Ban imposed, to come into effect from July 2008. Driving while sending text messages separately banned with effect from Jan 1st 2008 |
| WestVirginia | No | Billproposed in 1999, but never debated |
| Wisconsin | No | Bill tointroduce ban failed in April 1998. Bill to ban youngerdrivers only being debated. |
| Wyoming | No | Billproposed by Rep. Floyd Esquibel but not debated |